So last week I attended a Treaty of Waitangi Workshop here at Onewhero Area School. Open to community, and whanau, it was amazing to see 17 representatives from OAS turn up, including most of the Board, SLT, and some teachers.
Expecting to be taught again about the '3 P's' and the two different versions, I was pleasantly surprised, and totally engaged in what we did discuss. So below are
my interpretations of this powerful TOW Workshop.
Kawa for the night: you are not expected to agree with everything that is presented, but you are asked to keep an open mind to what you hear.
'The true intent of the Treaty, and what it means to keep its real meaning at the heart of our thinking'
A great way to start 'any' learning activity with akonga is to present them with 'The Wave' diagram above. Out of the 7 vantage points on the diagram, who would have the best idea about how a wave works? Who would be able to state how 'big' the wave is? Who can hear the wave the best?
Its all about 'perspectives' and its all about the many differences of opinions, based on what they can see, hear, smell, been taught already, what they don't know, interest levels, and whats 'in it for them'.
So is one way right or wrong? Who can claim to be the 'authority' on The Wave? Or does everyone bring a new angle of The Wave, that is just as interesting, and right/wrong as the others?
Being the very open-minded, and insightful group that we were, we could understand the importance of what this diagram was telling us..................especially in relation to Treaty of Waitangi discussions.
But it is a great 'starter' activity in the classroom, to create discussion about 'different ways of seeing things'.
So who is the Treaty between: Maori and Pakeha is what I probably flippantly say when asked. But a Treaty, in International law, is an agreement between sovereign nations - not between 'cultural' groups. So who is the Treaty between: The Crown and Hapu.
Probably the most important thing I took out of the night, was that the Treaty is not about Colonisation. What we hear through the media as 'Treaty' issues (grievances, claims, settlements) are all due to Colonisation - which would be issues today even if there had not been a Treaty.
When you look at the general population figures from 1800 to 1860, Maori still held the upper hand in terms of 'people numbers'. Although, the number of Tauiwi was fast increasing, Maori still held fairly good relationships with the original settlers - the Tauiwi who first came, and adopted Maori customs, language, and culture. They understood the 'taonga' that is the Maori culture.
The Treaty was designed to encompass these relationships, strengthen them, and allow for a truly bi-cultural nation to evolve. Bi-cultural meaning that people are equally competent when operating in either of two cultures. Using the strengths of each culture to build a nation.
We were challenged to look at the Treaty in this regard, without looking at the aspects of Colonisation that led to one nation exerting its power and political control over the Tangata Whenua. Certainly, the message wasn't to forget the past, and forget what has happened to lead to this point in our Nations young life, but to instead try to think about the Treaty in its true meaning - building relationships. Equity not Equality.
So the big question: how do we attempt to do this in schools?
We were presented a really easy way to encourage discussion about Treaty relationships, without actually explicitly studying the Treaty.
Take a simple unit on Place Names. In five steps, you can go a little way into developing young minds into thinking like the Treaty wanted us to.
Maori Culture - Other Cultures - Treaty - Colonisation - So what now?
What do we know about Place Names in NZ? What would the Maori Cultural aspect be? What are Other Cultures aspects? In what way can we stay true to the Treaty in terms of Place Names? What has colonisation done in regards to Place Names? What can we do now, what actions would be right?
Pretty cool that the group that spoke to us are also developing a resource for NZ schools, basing it on the above concept, and covering many Learning Areas of the NZC.
To finish off, I would like to set you a challenge. Here is the quiz we were asked to do at the start. True/False Questions: Have a go.
Answer: They are ALL false! How did you go?